No
TT goodness lately; just too busy to schedule my 6:30 viewing. What I have been doing, however, in the wee hours of the morning when I just can't be arsed viewing, is surfing midnlessly for an hour in between 3 or 4 hours of reading. Yes, I need to be more organised and organise my notes properly but neener neener neener, I won't!
I came across
this site and was struck by the overall bitterness of its content and even moreso by the tone of the forums. Several threads were running regarding a man's education and income and its relation to his ability to date American women, dubbed "american whores" by these geniuses. Most of the men admitted to having lower incomes than were desired by the women they considered worth dating, and weren't too keen on the idea of a degree, either. The only people who mock degrees are either engineering/business types who enjoy ragging on arts students (ahem, Harry) or the uneducated. Of course, there's also the bitter student with mountains of debt who begins to doubt his course, but that just seems to come with the territory; a degree seems to be mandatory for any job worth having these days, unless you're self made millionaire material or interested in a trade.
My grasp of evolutionary psychology is tenuous, at best, especially as I think it's a load of bull, but the bloke in the sunnies, you know who I mean (and if you don't, you're probably smart enough to have passed the subject over altogether), went on for ages in one of his books about a mate's worth, and marrying up, and all sorts of kind of semi interesting theories that weren't particularly well supported by evidence and poorly written, to boot. Sure, an uneducated, low income man might think he's worth the slim, beautiful, woman simply because they exist on similar socioeconomic levels, but the number of slim, beautiful women in the west is dropping thanks to an ever rising obesity rate. If they can marry up, to a man with prestige and wealth, why would they consider (by anyone's definition) a loser? Aim low, oh jaded single men, and ye shall reep dividends.
They're all particularly keen on foreign marriage too; apparently it's the best way to find yourself young, slim, beautiful, submissive woman with dreams of homemaking and hours of hot sex. And these women, are they dreaming of rich husbands with beautiful homes and good jobs? Must be a rude shock to get home to Bumfuck, USA and realise that your wonderful, cradle robbing husband is really just a manufacturing worker with a modest apartment, nothing in savings (well, not after the trip to purchase his bride) and quite a chip on his shoulder thanks to years of rejection from women who exist far out of his league.
I've seen a few articles about this phenomenon over the years, with men who aren't worth particularly much materially being rejected by women who have the luxury of opting out of the marriage race altogether if they can't find someone to their liking. I realise that women cop a lot of flack over their decision, but I do believe that they have "choice" on their side; not having to prove their self worth with a high income, beautiful mate and expensive positions is another bonus. The man who runs the site, and the men who post on his forum probably aren't worth enough to appeal to politicians, but what happens in the future, as more and more jobs go overseas and women continue to tell themselves that they're worth more than some loser with nothing material or intellectual to offer? For some reason, men like this always seem to be against dating the sort of women they can attract: the losers, the chip shop regulars, the single mothers in low income housing, the women whose highest aspiration would be hairdresser, or perhaps shop assistant.
We've heard loads about the professional women who find that all the eligible men either marry early, to those they consider their equals, or eschew their equals altogether for the pretty girl. Hey, more power to them! Pretty girls need love too. Popular culture glorifies the single, well off thirtysomething with her 'all men are bastards philosophy' and it always has time for the pretty girl who marries up. It also seems to be down with the devoted husband and family man or the well off rake who sets his sights on the pretty girl. But losers? Tough luck, pals.
So, why aren't we seeing an army of angry, dissatisfied, lower class women who've been rejected by these men? Bring on the bogan bitches and their Websites of hatred! I firmly believe in equality (and more amusing reads for me).